New Age History and Economics

The Day We See The Truth And Cease To Speak it, Is The Day We Begin To Die. MLK Jr.

Monday, October 16, 2017

Mein Kampf WELTANSCHAUUNG AND PARTY-II


Lies being taught;
Mein Kampf is unintelligible ravings of a maniac.

Now the Truth; Read and know. VOLUME II: THE NATIONAL SOCIALIST MOVEMENT CHAPTER I; WELTANSCHAUUNG AND PARTY-II.

By helping to lift the human being above the level of mere animal existence, Faith really contributes to consolidate and safeguard its own existence. Taking humanity as it exists to-day and taking into consideration the fact that the religious beliefs which it generally holds and which have been consolidated through our education, so that they serve as moral standards in practical life, if we should now abolish religious teaching and not replace it by anything of equal value the result would be that the foundations of human existence would be seriously shaken. We may safely say that man does not live merely to serve higher ideals, but that these ideals, in their turn, furnish the necessary conditions of his existence as a human being. And thus the circle is closed.

Of course, the word 'religious' implies some ideas and beliefs that are fundamental. Among these we may reckon the belief in the immortality of the soul, its future existence in eternity, the belief in the existence of a Higher Being, and so on. But all these ideas, no matter how firmly the individual believes in them, may be critically analysed by any person and accepted or rejected accordingly, until the emotional concept or yearning has been transformed into an active service that is governed by a clearly defined doctrinal faith. Such a faith furnishes the practical outlet for religious feeling to express itself and thus opens the way through which it can be put into practice.

Without a clearly defined belief, the religious feeling would not only be worthless for the purposes of human existence but even might contribute towards a general disorganization, on account of its vague and multifarious tendencies.

What I have said about the word 'religious' can also be applied to the term VÖLKISCH. This word also implies certain fundamental ideas. Though these ideas are very important indeed, they assume such vague and indefinite forms that they cannot be estimated as having a greater value than mere opinions, until they become constituent elements in the structure of a political party. For in order to give practical force to the ideals that grow out of a WELTANSCHAUUNG and to answer the demands which are a logical consequence of such ideals, mere sentiment and inner longing are of no practical assistance, just as freedom cannot be won by a universal yearning for it. No. Only when the idealistic longing for independence is organized in such a way that it can fight for its ideal with military force, only then can the urgent wish of a people be transformed into a potent reality.

Any WELTANSCHAUUNG, though a thousandfold right and supremely beneficial to humanity, will be of no practical service for the maintenance of a people as long as its principles have not yet become the rallying point of a militant movement. And, on its own side, this movement will remain a mere party until is has brought its ideals to victory and transformed its party doctrines into the new foundations of a State which gives the national community its final shape.

If an abstract conception of a general nature is to serve as the basis of a future development, then the first prerequisite is to form a clear understanding of the nature and character and scope of this conception. For only on such a basis can a movement he founded which will be able to draw the necessary fighting strength from the internal cohesion of its principles and convictions. From general ideas a political programme must be constructed and a general WELTANSCHAUUNG must receive the stamp of a definite political faith. Since this faith must be directed towards ends that have to be attained in the world of practical reality, not only must it serve the general ideal as such but it must also take into consideration the means that have to be employed for the triumph of the ideal. Here the practical wisdom of the statesman must come to the assistance of the abstract idea, which is correct in itself. In that way an eternal ideal, which has everlasting significance as a guiding star to mankind, must be adapted to the exigencies of human frailty so that its practical effect may not be frustrated at the very outset through those shortcomings which are general to mankind. The exponent of truth must here go hand in hand with him who has a practical knowledge of the soul of the people, so that from the realm of eternal verities and ideals what is suited to the capacities of human nature may be selected and given practical form. To take abstract and general principles,
derived from a WELTANSCHAUUNG which is based on a solid foundation of truth, and transform them into a militant community whose members have the same political faith--a community which is precisely defined, rigidly organized, of one mind and one will--such a transformation is the most important task of all; for the possibility of successfully carrying out the idea is dependent on the successful fulfilment of that task. Out of the army of millions who feel the truth of these ideas, and even may understand them to some extent, one man must arise. This man must have the gift of being able to expound general ideas in a clear and definite form, and, from the world of vague ideas shimmering before the minds of the masses, he must formulate principles that will be as clear-cut and firm as granite. He must fight for these principles as the only true ones, until a solid rock of common faith and common will emerges above the troubled waves of vagrant ideas. The general justification of such action is to be sought in the necessity for it and
the individual will be justified by his success.

If we try to penetrate to the inner meaning of the word VÖLKISCH we arrive at the following conclusions:

The current political conception of the world is that the State, though it possesses a creative force which can build up civilizations, has nothing in common with the concept of race as the foundation of the State. The State is considered rather as something which has resulted from economic necessity, or, at best, the natural outcome of the play of political forces and impulses. Such a conception of the foundations of the State, together with all its logical consequences, not only ignores the primordial racial forces that underlie the State, but it also leads to a policy in which the importance of the individual is minimized. If it be denied that races differ from one another in their powers of cultural creativeness, then this same erroneous notion must necessarily influence our estimation of the value of the individual. The assumption that all races are alike leads to the assumption that nations and
individuals are equal to one another. And international Marxism is nothing but the application--effected by the Jew, Karl Marx--of a general conception of life to a definite profession of political faith; but in reality that general concept had existed long before the time of Karl Marx. If it had not already existed as a widely diffused infection the amazing political progress of the Marxist teaching would never have been possible. In reality what distinguished Karl Marx from the millions who were affected in the same way was that, in a world already in a state of gradual decomposition, he used his keen powers of prognosis to detect the essential poisons, so as to extract them and concentrate them, with the art of a necromancer, in a solution which would bring about the rapid destruction of the independent nations on the globe. But all this was done in the service of his race.

Thus the Marxist doctrine is the concentrated extract of the mentality which underlies the general concept of life to-day. For this reason alone it is out of the question and even ridiculous to think that what is called our bourgeois world can put up any effective fight against Marxism. For this bourgeois world is permeated with all those same poisons and its conception of life in general differs from Marxism only in degree and in the character of the persons who hold it. The bourgeois world is Marxist but believes in the possibility of a certain group of people--that is to say, the bourgeoisie--being able to dominate the world, while Marxism itself systematically aims at delivering the world into the hands of the Jews.

Over against all this, the VÖLKISCH concept of the world recognizes that the primordial racial elements are of the greatest significance for mankind. In principle, the State is looked upon only as a means to an end and this end is the conservation of the racial characteristics of mankind. Therefore on the VÖLKISCH principle we cannot admit that one race is equal to another. By recognizing that they are different, the VÖLKISCH concept separates mankind into races of superior and inferior quality. On the basis of this recognition it feels bound in conformity with the eternal Will that dominates the universe, to postulate the victory of the better and stronger and the subordination of the inferior and weaker. And so it pays homage to the truth that the principle underlying all Nature's operations is the aristocratic principle and it believes that this law holds good even down to the last individual organism. It selects individual values from the mass and thus operates as an organizing principle, whereas Marxism acts as a disintegrating solvent. The VÖLKISCH belief holds that humanity must have its ideals, because ideals are a necessary condition of human existence itself. But, on the other hand, it denies that an ethical ideal has the right to
prevail if it endangers the existence of a race that is the standard-bearer of a higher ethical ideal. For in a world which would be composed of mongrels and negroids all ideals of human beauty and nobility and all hopes of an idealized future for our humanity would be lost forever.

On this planet of ours human culture and civilization are indissolubly bound up with the presence of the Aryan. If he should be exterminated or subjugated, then the dark shroud of a new barbarian era would enfold the
earth.

To undermine the existence of human culture by exterminating its founders and custodians would be an execrable crime in the eyes of those who believe that the folk-idea lies at the basis of human existence. Whoever would dare to raise a profane hand against that highest image of God among His creatures would sin against the bountiful Creator of this marvel and would collaborate in the expulsion from Paradise.

Hence the folk concept of the world is in profound accord with Nature's will; because it restores the free play of the forces which will lead the race through stages of sustained reciprocal education towards a higher type, until finally the best portion of mankind will possess the earth and will be free to work in every domain all over the world and even reach spheres that lie outside the earth.

We all feel that in the distant future many may be faced with problems which can be solved only by a superior race of human beings, a race destined to become master of all the other peoples and which will have at its disposal the means and resources of the whole world.

It is evident that such a general sketch of the ideas implied in the folk concept of the world may easily be interpreted in a thousand different ways. As a matter of fact there is scarcely one of our recent political movements that does not refer at some point to this conception of the world. But the fact that this conception of the world still maintains its independent existence in face of all the others proves that their ways of looking at life are quite difierent from this. Thus the Marxist conception, directed by a central organization endowed with supreme authority, is opposed by a motley crew of opinions which is not very impressive in face of the solid phalanx presented by the enemy. Victory cannot be achieved with such weak weapons. Only when the international idea, politically organized by Marxism, is confronted by the folk idea, equally well organized in a systematic way and equally well led--only then will the fighting energy in the one camp be able to meet that of the other on an equal footing; and victory will be found on the side of eternal truth.

But a general conception of life can never be given an organic embodiment until it is precisely and definitely formulated. The function which dogma fulfils in religious belief is parallel to the function which party principles fulfil for a political party which is in the process of being built up. Therefore, for the conception of life that is based on the folk idea it is necessary that an instrument be forged which can be used in fighting for this ideal, similar to the Marxist party organization which clears the way for internationalism.

And this is the aim which the German National Socialist Labour Movement pursues.

The folk conception must therefore be definitely formulated so that it may be organically incorporated in the party. That is a necessary prerequisite for the success of this idea. And that it is so is very clearly proved even by the indirect acknowledgment of those who oppose such an amalgamation of the folk idea with party principles. The very people who never tire of insisting again and again that the conception of life based on the folk idea can never be the exclusive property of a single group, because it lies dormant or 'lives' in myriads of hearts, only confirm by their own statements the simple fact that the general presence of such ideas in the hearts of millions of men has not proved sufficient to impede the victory of the opposing ideas, which are championed by a political party organized on the principle of class conflict. If that were not so, the German people ought already to have gained a gigantic victory instead of finding themselves on the brink of the abyss. The international ideology achieved success because it was organized in a militant political party which was always ready to take the offensive. If hitherto the ideas opposed to the international concept have had to give way before the latter the reason is that they lacked a united front to fight for their cause. A doctrine which forms a definite outlook on life cannot struggle and triumph by allowing the right of free interpretation of its general teaching, but only by defining that teaching in certain articles of faith that have to be accepted and incorporating it in a political organization.

Therefore I considered it my special duty to extract from the extensive but vague contents of a general WELTANSCHAUUNG the ideas which were essential and give them a more or less dogmatic form. Because of their precise and clear meaning, these ideas are suited to the purpose of uniting in a common front all those who are ready to accept them as principles. In other words: The German National Socialist Labour Party extracts the essential principles from the general conception of the world which is based on the folk idea. On these principles it establishes a political doctrine which takes into account the practical realities of the day, the nature of the times, the available human material and all its deficiencies. Through this political doctrine it is possible to bring great masses of the people into an organization which is constructed as rigidly as it could be. Such an organization is the main preliminary that is necessary for the final triumph of this ideal.

Adolf Hitler.

Sunday, October 1, 2017

Indian Army in Kashmir

Lies being Taught; Indian army is commiting atrocities in Kashmirl
Now the truth; 

















China's Imperialist or Expansionist Designs?

China's border disputes with 18 countries | Imperialism or Expansionist Designs?

Lies being told.
China has no expansionist designs.

Now the truth;
Did it ever occur to you that China has territorial disputes with all the nations it shares a border with and eight other countries? The exception is the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, which it keeps on its payroll. A look into the phenomenon that is Chinese imperialism and its expansionist designs.

Here is a list of the countries that have territorial and border disputes with China:

Japan :: Parts of the East China Sea, particularly the Senkaku Islands. Also, on occasion, the Ryukyu Islands, on the grounds that the completely independent Kingdom of Ryukyu was once a vassal state of China. The Kingdom of Ryukyu terminated tributary relations with China in 1874. 

Vietnam :: China claims large parts of Vietnam on historical precedent (Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644). Also, Macclesfield Bank, Paracel Islands, parts of the South China Sea and the Spratly Islands. 

India :: China illegally occupies 38,000 sq km (Aksai Chin) of land in Jammu & Kashmir. It also holds 5,180 km of Indian territory in Pakistan occupied Kashmir under Sino-Pak agreement of 1963. At the heart of Sino-Indian boundary dispute is the issue of Arunachal Pradesh (90,000 sq km), which China describes as "Southern Tibet". Beijing is demanding that at least the Tawang Tract of Arunachal Pradesh, if not the whole of the state, be transferred to China.

Nepal :: China claims parts of Nepal dating back to the Sino-Nepalese War in 1788-1792. China claims they are part of Tibet, therefore part of China.

North Korea :: Baekdu Mountain and Jiandao. China has also on occasion claimed all of North Korea on historical grounds (Yuan Dynasty, 1271-1368).

The Philippines :: Parts of the South China Sea, particularly Scarborough Shoal and the Spratly Islands. Russia :: 160,000 square kilometres still unilaterally claimed by China, despite China signing several agreements. Singapore :: Parts of the South China Sea.

South Korea :: Parts of the East China Sea. China has also on occasion claimed all of South Korea on historical grounds (Yuan Dynasty, 1271-1368).

Bhutan :: Bhutanese enclaves in Tibet, namely Cherkip Gompa, Dho, Dungmar, Gesur, Gezon, Itse Gompa, Khochar, Nyanri, Ringung, Sanmar, Tarchen and Zuthulphuk. Also Kula Kangri and mountainous areas to the west of this peak, plus the western Haa District of Bhutan.

Taiwan :: China claims all of Taiwan, but particular disputes are: Macclesfi eld Bank, Paracel Islands, Scarborough Shoal, parts of the South China Sea and the Spratly Islands. The Paracel Islands, also called Xisha Islands in Vietnamese, is a group of islands in the South China Sea whose sovereignty is disputed among China, Taiwan and Vietnam disputes with Burma.

Kazakhstan :: There are continual unilateral claims by China on Kazakhstan territory, despite new agreements, in China's favour signed every few years.

Laos :: China claims large areas of Laos on historical precedent (China's Yuan Dynasty, 1271-1368).

Brunei :: Over Spratly Islands. The Spratly Islands is a disputed group of more than 750 reefs, islets, atolls, cays, and islands in the South China Sea. About 45 islands are occupied by small numbers of military forces from the People's Republic of China, Taiwan, Vietnam, the Philippines, and Malaysia. Brunei has also claimed an exclusive economic zone in the southeastern part of the Spratlys encompassing just one area of small islands on Louisa Reef. This has led to escalating tensions.

Tajikistan :: Chinese claims based on historical precedent (Qing Dynasty, 1644-1912).

Cambodia :: China has, on occasion, claimed parts of Cambodia on historical precedent (China's Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644). Indonesia :: Parts of the South China Sea.

Kyrgyzstan :: China claims the majority of Kyrgyzstan on the grounds that it was unfairly forced to cede the territory (which it had formerly conquered) to Russia in the 19th century.

Malaysia :: Over Parts of the South China Sea, particularly the Spratly Islands.

Mongolia :: China claims all of Mongolia on historical precedent (Yuan 
Dynasty, 1271-1368). In fact, Mongolia, under Genghis Khan, occupied China.

Afghanistan :: Afghan province of Bahdakhshan (despite a bilateral treaty of 1963, China still encroaches on Afghan territory). 

Source; Tarek Fatah

Saturday, September 16, 2017

illuminati- The conclusion



Lies being Taught;
Illuminati is a sham;
Now the truth;
Here I reproduce last part of series on article by a friend whose judgment I fully trust;
Illuminati: Conclusion
        You don't have to agree with everything that was written above; even if you revoke all conspiracy theories that were mentioned, something is still very wrong with the function of life. I, by no means, want to tell you how to think or what to believe, the media and government does enough of that; this paper was about the information; take from it what you will, leave what doesn't fit. Look up the facts that are presented and see for yourself, don't take my word for it.
        It doesn't matter if you're against the idea of global warming, genetically modified organisms, the monetary system or just the fact that the government keeps too much information from the people; whatever concept you're fighting with it's still against the system. People need to look past the ways we differ and look at the things we have in common.
        Religion is one of the main causes of war and has killed so many people just because they don't share the same belief; that's just focusing on the way we're different. We're not supposed to judge people for their beliefs or the color of their skin, but by their actions. If there's to be any hope for humanity we need to open our eyes and resort to reason.
“If you could flick a switch and open your third eye you’d see that we should never be afraid to die”
                                                                                -Muse-
        Many people see what's going on around them but don't want to get involved because they feel they need to take care of their family. But what will become of the family or the individual if this plan for global dictatorship is successful?
        So how do we get out of this? For starters we would need to challenge their source of power; the monetary system. If the Central Banks of each country would succumb to a public audit there's no way they could legally atone for all the missing money. If you don't want to take my word on how the money system works I invite you to investigate the matter yourself. Only with an honest and fair monetary system could a country have a chance to truly be free.
        The corruption in politics would definitely need correcting if all the scandals on child abuse are true. I'm pleased to inform you that such actions are being taken on a political and religious level. The Association of Citizen Prosecutors (ACP) and the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) will be prosecuting the Vatican, Crown of England, Canada and the pharmaceutical companies for crimes against humanity. I wish the attorneys Jason Bowman and Rev. Kevin Annett good luck and hope they are not killed before making it to court.
        I understand that there are those who are completely oblivious to the corruption in the system and some people just can't handle the implications of such knowledge; some people just aren't interested in the truth. There's no way anyone will listen to any of this if they don't want to know. I've sent this paper to those who are curious on what is really going on and I'm asking those who read and believe it and do their own research; if you find someone who is curious on such matters to spread the word.
        People are generally afraid to speak up about what they believe especially when it's about something out of the ordinary. The term Conspiracy Theorist has been met with so much ridicule so that people won't want to believe what they have to say or what evidence they present. Nobody wants to be made fun of; some would say it's even better to be one with the crowd. People may be mocked because they're different, but what's really wrong with a having a different opinion and going against the grain?
"You laugh at me because I'm different. I laugh at you because you're all the same."
                                                                        -David Icke
        Only after human awakens to the fact that everything works in a design could we stand up to the tyranny of those that are in control. They lavish in money and don't want us to be aware of ourselves. We are a drop of rain in a pool of cosmic consciousness that should seek something more than money. No religion is absolutely right . The answers needed for actual meaning should be sought within ourselves, not in this material world.
"This is the American spirit, to count and compare instead of being content with spiritual satisfaction. This is what is meant by the Scripture, 'The love of money is the root of all evil.'"
                                                        -Aleister Crowley-
        That's the idea behind their main goal; to keep people trapped in this matrix of materialism. We are many if we realize it. We are all spiritually connected to each other and until people awaken to what's really going on we, as a race, can never fully live up to our potential.
        Among our civilization there are the naive who deny anything is wrong with the current system and have every doubt that the government has been lying to them their entire lives. People don't like to feel everything they've believed in is wrong so changing their opinions would be difficult. Then we have those who know there's a conspiracy and think "I'm only one person, there's nothing I can do about it", which is probably the majority. But then there is the third type who knows what's going on and they stand up for what they believe in and participate in peaceful protests.
        Historically speaking Great Britain took over India by force, a people who are passive in nature. Britain lost control of this country because they listened to reason and went up against men like Gandhi. The reason Gandhi was so successful is because he had so many supporters. Today we’re supposed to be living in the Age of Reason and the government is “supposed” to look out for its people. Only after the majority of people cry out as one will the government be obligated to listen. Otherwise small groups of protestors and riots will be crushed and treated as criminals.
        A rogue group of citizens participate in league to what we now commonly refer to as "Anonymous". You can often identify them in peaceful protests wearing a Guy Fawkes' mask, who attempted to blow up Parliament on November 5, 1605 and was hung for treason, often popularized from the movie "V for Vendetta". The government would like you to look among this group as a terrorist organization responsible for computer crimes. It is but a group of people, started by hackers who seek change. Maybe not everything everyone has done in this group can be condoned, but at least they take a firm stance against tyranny within our governments.
        Again I apologize to those overseas; if there is any form of terrorist attacks in your area, I offer you to look into the implications that relate to your own governments. This Illuminati conspiracy reaches far and wide around the world. Where they have rule of the corrupt monetary systems they can conquer areas of the government.
        Only after the population awakens to what is going on can we act to correct the wrongs that the few men have dictated into our lives. We, the people, need to act and stand up to the oppressions that have been thrown at us and it's up to us to stand up for what's right. Questions need to be asked and peaceful demonstrations need to be conducted rather than assassinations and riots.
        Some would say this will lead to war between the people and the government and I don't deny that possibility. War is coming, regardless; if one reads the world news they can feel tension growing in the Middle East. Egypt's new president called for an attack on Israel. Other countries will be dragged into this war as well and people will be caught fighting under false pretenses where none of our enemies are dying, but just people. Our family members who serve in the military, who think they're serving a patriotic cause, but are being used as pawns by those who have never stepped foot on a battlefield. Patriotism is just a country’s version of devotion as faith is to a religion. The Illuminati could spark WWIII as a means to depopulate the Earth, serving their agenda, or they could have the government fight in their defense to the people who have caught on. Only if conducted through careful rational will a war be preventable. It doesn’t have to be fought on a battlefield but a courtroom through diplomatic discretion.
        If you find other people that are equally as curious and on the verge of waking up, I urge you to pass this along to those that will read it. This is warning ahead of time, the economy is set up to collapse; money is decreasing in value by the second. Eventually it will cost $20 for loaf of bread. If people are just going to sit back and let this happen it's best to stock up on rations and supplies now. If you own your own land you may need a garden to produce your own food. Dark times are coming and I hope people will heed this warning.
        Perhaps it's asking something very radical for people to act against those who dictate our lives. Good people, in general, do what it takes to maintain peace. Our children grow up and are put into a corrupt indoctrinating system that forces them to believe lies. The change that's being asked for is no easy task and if we're not going to act we can at least give the hidden version of truth to those that precede us so they can see the corruption around.
"To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards out of men."
                                                                -Abraham Lincoln
Michael;